The most significant change made by SB 943 is the statutory clarification of the Texas Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Boeing Company v. Paxton. In Boeing, the Texas Supreme Court held that the disclosure exception provided by Section 552.104 of the PIA applied to private parties. Following this 2015 decision, government vendors and contractors cited 552.104 as their basis for objecting to public disclosure of documents when such disclosure would provide an advantage to a competitor or bidder. In passing SB 943, the Texas Legislature has effectively reversed the Boeing decision and clarified that Section 552.104 can only be invoked by “governmental bodies” when the governmental body proves that public disclosure of the requested documents will harm the governmental body’s interests and provide “an advantage to a competitor or bidder in a particular ongoing competitive situation” or in a “particular competitive situation” that is “set to reoccur.”
Another important change encompassed within SB 943, is that the PIA will clearly specify that “contracting information” is public, must be disclosed unless an exception applies, and is defined to include: “information in a voucher or contract relating to the receipt or expenditure of public funds,” “bid documents relating to a contract with a governmental body,” “communications between a governmental body and vendor/contractor or potential vendor/contractor during negotiations and performance on the contract,” and “documents showing the governmental body’s criteria for evaluating bids.”
In addition, SB 943 specifies that an entity cannot argue that the following types of “contracting information” are protected by the trade secret and commercial and financial exception or the proprietary information exception:
SB 943 also creates a new third party exception within the PIA for the “confidentiality of proprietary information.” Located in the newly created Section 552.1101, this exception will apply to vendors, contractors, potential vendors, or potential contractors who have submitted “proprietary information” to a governmental body in response to a government bid or proposal. In order to prevent public disclosure of this “proprietary information,” third parties must demonstrate “based on specific factual evidence” that disclosure of the information would provide an advantage to a competitor and will reveal an internal, individualized approach of the non-governmental entity to which the PIA request inquires.
In addition, SB 943 creates an entirely new subchapter within the PIA that applies to any non-governmental entity that enters into a contract with a governmental body requiring a public expenditure of $1 million or more. When a governmental body receives a written request for public information in connection with such a contract, and the public information is held by the non-governmental entity, the governmental entity must forward the request to the non-governmental entity within three business days. Furthermore, the governmental body has eighteen business days from receipt of the public information request to ask the Attorney General if the requested information falls within an exception to the PIA.
Finally, SB 943 revises Section 552.003(1)’s definition of “governmental bodies” to include certain confinement and civil commitment housing facilities, and excludes certain economic development entities. It also enables certain economic development entities to claim exceptions to public disclosure under Section 552.305, and provides a statutory definition of “trade secret” in Section 552.110.
While SB 943 includes the most substantial changes to Texas’s PIA, the Legislature passed several other bills that may affect compliance with the PIA. They are:
For more information on how this could impact your organization or governmental entity, contact: